If Gender Ideology is About Promoting Tolerance, Why Are Alternative Viewpoints Not Tolerated in the Discussion?

In recent years, the introduction of gender ideology into educational curricula has become a hot-button issue, sparking heated debates among parents, educators, and policy-makers alike. Proponents argue that teaching children about the complexities of gender is essential for fostering an inclusive environment. They believe that this form of education is pivotal in reducing bullying and discrimination, as well as in helping children understand themselves and the diverse world around them.

However, what seems paradoxical is the narrative that has developed around the issue; a narrative that often silences or marginalizes those who question or disagree with the incorporation of gender ideology into schools. If the ultimate goal of introducing gender ideology into educational settings is to promote a culture of acceptance and tolerance, then shouldn’t that culture extend to all viewpoints, including those that might be skeptical or questioning the new curriculum?

The Need for Open Dialogue

Many parents are not opposed to the teaching of values like inclusivity and tolerance. Rather, their concerns often revolve around the methods used and the age appropriateness of such education. Additionally, some parents want the option to introduce these complex concepts to their children themselves, in a manner aligned with their own beliefs and values, or perhaps when their children are older and better able to understand.

The lack of open dialogue and the stigmatization of dissenting voices can result in polarization. When questions and concerns are hastily labeled as bigoted or uninformed, without engaging in substantive discussion, it alienates individuals who might otherwise be receptive to the conversation. This fosters an ‘us-versus-them’ atmosphere, which contradicts the ideals of inclusivity and tolerance that proponents of gender ideology claim to champion. As witnessed during the 1 Million March 4 Children on September 20, 2023, the discussion seemed to be limited to two viewpoints: either you agreed with SOGI123 being taught in school to young children or you were accused of promoting hate. Resorting to name-calling and refusing to engage with differing opinions are not constructive ways to address this issue. However, for them that is the only weak argument they have because even their own stats on the topic don’t support what they are claiming. 

The Importance of Inclusion

Inclusion should be holistic. A truly inclusive environment does not selectively validate viewpoints, especially on an issue as complex and personal as gender ideology. By its very definition, inclusion should encompass all perspectives. Any educational initiative aiming to promote it should be open to scrutiny, questions, and, yes, even criticisms. Dare I say, parents should have the option to opt out for any reason. However, they may find themselves facing legal repercussions should they question it. Nothing says “we’re loving and tolerant” quite like the threat of jail time for those who disagree.

A Way Forward

It’s imperative to foster a climate where dialogue and discussions are encouraged, not stifled. Parents, educators, and policy-makers need to come together, listen to each other’s concerns, and collaboratively decide the best way forward for the children they collectively serve. For if we aim to teach the next generation the values of tolerance and inclusivity, then we must be willing to model those values ourselves, in all of our interactions, including the difficult conversations.

At the end of the day, it’s not really about promoting tolerance, is it? It seems to be an agenda that seeks a much different goal.

Censorship laws will separate you from the truth. Facebook has already blocked news posts
Sign up for our newsletter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *